 |
Crankfire
Systems TM
Welcome
to Emory Jones Crankfire Systems
TM
Original Manuals
and Tutorials
ORIGINAL CRANKFIRE
INSTALLATION AND OPERATION
Your
new Crankfire unit is a simple rugged and reliable mechanism.
Please take the time to read this information and familiarize
yourself with how and why the unit works. Doing so will allow
you to achieve the best possible performance with it.
First
a little background:
I have been involved in building
and shooting crank fired semi auto twin guns since the early
90s. I saw a pair of the Calico twin gatling guns (10/22s&M1
carbine) at a gun show. Not being financially in a position
to enjoy real full autos, I figured this was a way to come
as close as possible. While the Calicos were neat little setups,
they were designed more as a novelty item than anything else.
I wanted something a bit more serious, larger caliber, higher
rate of fire, larger magazine capacity, etc. The first hurdle
was to increase the rate of fire from that of the two lobe
cams. Yes I tried gears, I could write a book on the drawbacks
of that. The next option was more lobes on the cams. But if
the guns were to fire alternately, without using the Calico
style in and out sliding cam system, (another book filled
with grief) no matter where the crank stopped, one trigger
was in the fire position or dangerously close to it. So the
"floating cam" was born. You will notice that the
cam used in the Crankfire floats on the drive shaft within
the limits of the radial slots cut in it. This serves two
functions. In the single gun application it is part of the
safety system, allowing the trigger to go to the down position
as soon as the crank is stopped. In a twin gun set up it allows
the two guns to be phased to fire alternately and still both
go to a trigger down condition when the crank is stopped.
Combining the four lobe floaters with twin drum fed AR/AKs
etc. I had what I wanted, over 1000 rounds per minute. That
is until the semi auto beltfed 1919s came along. I just had
to have a pair of these little dazzlers with a crank! Guns
designed to run full bore and magazine capacity limited only
by my available credit line. The 1919 presented some unique
challenges; not much room around the trigger where the unit
wouldnt interfere with something else and no place to
mount it, without giving up the optics mount or the T&E
mount, but mostly the straight up trigger pull. In short,
that is why it is clamped to the buffer tube, and the cam
and rocker arm are above the trigger. This allowed me to convert
the rotary motion of the cam to angular motion of the rocker
arm and finally get straight linear motion of the trigger
slide (which the 1919 trigger really likes). I started with
the four-lobe cam like the others I had used, and the gun
ran quite briskly, but really jerky on the crank. I went to
the six-lobe cam primarily to smooth out the crank rotation.
This does how ever force you to not turn the crank too fast,
it will outrun the gun in a heartbeat. The purpose of the
pin type construction of the cam is that it provides the quickest
possible "snap" of the trigger, allowing the maximum
opportunity for the trigger disconnect to re-engage the sear
for the next shot. This brings us to the discussion of crank
speed. All full auto and semi auto guns can only run as fast
as their particular mechanical design, pitted against the
laws of physics, will allow them to. The standard 1919A4 full
auto gun is rated at 500 rounds per minute give or take a
few. And as I understand it, the full auto, when properly
timed, actually releases the striker just BEFORE the bolt
goes fully into battery. As most of us are stuck with the
somewhat clumsy Lee style semi trigger, that cant release
the striker until AFTER the bolt is in full battery, it is
doubtful that the semi will ever reach full auto rate. I think
this is why the gun seems to peak at the 460/470RPM point
and then starts to actually slow down. It would appear that
optimum crank speed is about 77/78 revolutions per minute,
and thats a lot slower than you think it is. In all
things mechanical, form must necessarily follow function,
but I did want the Crankfire to look as "right"
as possible when installed on the 1919s. I tried to approach
this as if it were being built in the early 1900s for the
military, using similar materials, shape and finish. The one
concession was the ball lock pin for the trigger roller, but
I figured a clevis pin with a cotter key would be a real PIA.
Well on to the step by step procedures.


Legal Notice "All
Crankfire Systems Gatling type Secondary Fire Control units,
components and design features are covered by U.S. Patent
#7,103,999 B2. Other Patents Pending."
Last Update: Jun 2008 |
 |